Hi All
This argument keeps appearing on this and other forums about the possibility of PAW (and other devices) generating false alerts that distract the pilot from other important tasks and the possibility that it increases rather than decreases pilot workload and may diminish peoples perception of its usefulness over time.
Now I have to confess to being a relatively newly qualified NPPL and find this hard to understand. I can vividly remember the syllabus for the NPPL in which every exercise has a sub-heading "Airmanship".
At the top of this section the very first item was "Lookout".
The whole idea behind the "Bearingless Mode a, c, s, Alerts" generated by PAW is to concentrate the mind on LOOKOUT, not to stare at the screen seeking information which is not going to be there.
Depending on your own settings in PAW and your navigation software you will be alerted to a target within +/- xxxx feet of your own altitude. The only clue to its distance will be the colour coding, Green, Amber, Red. If you then fail to obtain a visual on that target and it disappears without trace, no problem, if you do get a visual and it's no threat, again no problem, if you get a visual and need to take avoiding action, OK. In all of these situations PAW will have done its job. If you didn't get this warning whilst you were busy doing "something else important" as has been quoted and you encounter someone else also doing something other than "lookout" it could turn out to be the last warning you never get.
I've said it before and will say it again, there are no "False Alerts" generated by PAW (or other systems), it is telling you there is something in your vicinity that requires your attention and it's up to you what you do with that information. Ignore it at your and others peril.
If a few minutes of extra vigilant lookout is considered extra pilot workload then it's a burden we should all be prepared to carry.
Alan