Author Topic: Long Marston Test 17 October  (Read 39339 times)

The Westmorland Flyer

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #60 on: October 21, 2015, 11:53:27 pm »
I can't think of any way in which a TV tuner (PC based? Stand-alone TV?) or indeed any other receive-only kit could interfere with the ARF's operation.
John
G-JONL, Sportcruiser, Carlisle

stephenmelody

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #61 on: October 22, 2015, 12:04:32 am »
I mean the one used for picking up ads-b in the PAW system. Sorry, that wasn't too clear.

If I knew what this meant: aSSRSSIS-58 aMMRSSIM-54 it would help, I seem to get higher values without the dvb-t plugged in that when it is in...

I'll do further testing tomorrow with my two units in slave/master config to compare the outputs with and without the dvb-t tuner plugged in.

Ian Melville

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #62 on: October 22, 2015, 06:54:01 am »
2.4GHz is absorbed by water-based things such as foliage and people significantly more than is 800MHz, so I am not particularly surprised...
Thank you TWF, I was forgetting that they are quite different frequencies.

The Westmorland Flyer

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #63 on: October 22, 2015, 09:07:35 am »
I seem to get higher values without the dvb-t plugged in that when it is in...
That sounds like it might be a power supply problem. The DVB dongle is quite a greedy beast, which is why it gets so hot.
John
G-JONL, Sportcruiser, Carlisle

Paul_Sengupta

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #64 on: October 22, 2015, 09:48:03 am »
Just as a complete amateur, this may be a stupid question, but would the tv tuner interfere with the ARF at all?

It's been requested for the next set of tests that the DVB be removed for air-air testing to see if it makes a difference.

Richard W

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #65 on: October 22, 2015, 10:54:02 am »
If I knew what this meant: aSSRSSIS-58 aMMRSSIM-54 it would help
The -58 and -54 are the received signal strength at the slave and master respectively (I think that's the right way round). I believe that the figures should be in the low -twenties, for stations 30m apart, but  I could be mistaken.  Presumably your stations were separated by building structure at -58 db(i?) ?

Richard W

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #66 on: October 22, 2015, 11:00:16 am »
I seem to get higher values without the dvb-t plugged in that when it is in...
That sounds like it might be a power supply problem. The DVB dongle is quite a greedy beast, which is why it gets so hot.
The ARF is powered by the 3.3v regulator, which has a fair bit of headroom, so supply problems shouldn't be an issue.  I have never seen the 3.3v supply at anything less than 3.25

stephenmelody

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #67 on: October 22, 2015, 11:35:46 am »
If I knew what this meant: aSSRSSIS-58 aMMRSSIM-54 it would help
The -58 and -54 are the received signal strength at the slave and master respectively (I think that's the right way round). I believe that the figures should be in the low -twenties, for stations 30m apart, but  I could be mistaken.  Presumably your stations were separated by building structure at -58 db(i?) ?

So lower is better? They're separated by 1 floor in my house. I'll do some more testing then...

power supply isn't an issue, I'm using more than the recommended kit. 1x 4.2amp wall power supply with .5m juicybitz cable, the other is on a 2.4amp battery pack with the same cable.

Richard W

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #68 on: October 22, 2015, 12:25:31 pm »
To avoid misunderstanding, more positive numbers are better.  So -20 is better than -58.  Lee, please could we have some advice as to which way round the master/slave figures are, and what to expect at a given distance, say 30 foot?

Admin

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #69 on: October 22, 2015, 12:29:53 pm »
To avoid misunderstanding, more positive numbers are better.  So -20 is better than -58.  Lee, please could we have some advice as to which way round the master/slave figures are, and what to expect at a given distance, say 30 foot?

There is a description here ...
http://openmicros.org/index.php/articles/84-xrf-basics/146-rssimode

Richard W

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #70 on: October 22, 2015, 01:20:53 pm »
That is very helpful, thanks.  Do the max range figures of 88 to 92 apply to the ARF? ISTR seeing that the ARF has a more sensitive RX than the XRF

Admin

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #71 on: October 22, 2015, 02:48:43 pm »
my understanding is that once the figures get down to -90, the link becomes unreliable

Bill Maxwell

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #72 on: October 23, 2015, 11:05:12 pm »
I seem to get higher values without the dvb-t plugged in that when it is in...
That sounds like it might be a power supply problem. The DVB dongle is quite a greedy beast, which is why it gets so hot.
The ARF is powered by the 3.3v regulator, which has a fair bit of headroom, so supply problems shouldn't be an issue.  I have never seen the 3.3v supply at anything less than 3.25

It won't be a question of voltage headroom but the ability to supply all the current your entire set-up requires.

Richard W

Re: Long Marston Test 17 October
« Reply #73 on: October 24, 2015, 07:21:49 pm »
It won't be a question of voltage headroom but the ability to supply all the current your entire set-up requires.

If the current supply is insufficient the supply voltage will necessarily drop, or crowbar off entirely.  A 3.3v regulator will typically function until the supply voltage has dropped to 4.3v, but the Pi can be expected to fail before that, when the supply reaches the specified minimum of 4.75v.