Show Posts

You can view here all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas to which you currently have access.


Messages - Richard

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 24
46
Thank you
    Yes that is the answers I suspected from the testing.  Grate keep up the brilliant work you are doing. 

47
Team,
   What happens when an aircraft is carrying FLARM and PAW actively transmitting both ?

48
General Discussion / Re: Thank you PilotAware
« on: March 28, 2017, 06:28:06 pm »
Can you put it on YouTube and post the link?

49
General Discussion / Re: Thank you PilotAware
« on: March 28, 2017, 12:13:27 pm »
Can you post the video on this thread so we can have a look at it too, please

50
General Discussion / Re: PWA and other device
« on: March 24, 2017, 07:51:07 pm »
I Also highly recommend Trig, they have the best backup service you will ever find in aviation

51
Technical Support / Re: Radar View
« on: February 24, 2017, 09:06:58 pm »
Just another suggestion but if your looking for a second display for the radar. How about a smart watch running android? There are some with larger screens they may be ok. Has anyone got a smart watch they could try?


52
General Discussion / Re: FL*RM Integration - Beta Testers
« on: January 09, 2017, 08:47:30 am »

BTW - is there any received wisdom re the pros and cons of the red-box FL@RM unit vs the FL@RM Mouse? I have read a thread here somewhere taht said the GPS antenna in teh mouse is small and is a bit of a poor perfomer - not good if teh mouse becomes your primary GPS source for all the conspicuity and nav app systems, so the red box plus a GPS dongle sounds to me a better idea (but of course more wiring!)

Hi stu,
     Your observersions of the antennas is good thinking. For the FLARM redbox, it just needs to be mounted at a position you can conect the RS232 cable to PAW and to get the antenna lead to a position you have described. For the small GPS antenna, mounted in clear vue of the sky. For the question of reliability, after about 20 hours of flight I have never had a dropout or never noticed an inaccurate reading at all, it all works perfectly passing GPS info to my PAW. The GPS antenna is small enough to hide it away. I think the problem was with the FLARM mouse in built antenna., someone  may give you the info on that.

53
Technical Support / Re: Audio Testing
« on: January 02, 2017, 05:17:20 pm »
Hi Alan,
   Just for reference I don't get any sound interference from the PAW, My setup is Funkwerk  Transceiver with built in audio intercom and AUX sound input which is fed by a PA-60 Audio Mixer http://www.fdatasystems.com/ap-60-audio-mixer/ to which PAW is connected along side SMARTASS.  I have added a separate volume for PAW to my panel, so the I can set the volume to very Quiet on the ground/Taxi and turn it up when settled into flight it all works a treat.

54
General Discussion / Re: FL*RM Integration - Beta Testers
« on: December 30, 2016, 10:36:43 pm »
Stu,
    Just a suggestion but could you mount on the underside of your aircraft? (Upside down) works just as well.

55
General Discussion / Re: FL*RM Integration - Beta Testers
« on: December 30, 2016, 09:53:25 pm »
(Not sure whether the standard PAW dipole is even suitable for external mounting)

Stu B
    I'm currently experimenting with mounting the standard supplied dipole mounted externally. If you put the antenna in its vertical position and use hot glue pushed into the joint, then get some glued lined (waterproof) heat shrink over the mount too, it is nearly impossible for it to bend. Now mounted to the suitable extention.... it works a treat .... not sure how long it will last with 135knot airspeed over time.

56
Technical Support / Re: Connecting Trig21 to PAW
« on: December 20, 2016, 01:24:25 pm »
You can use another pilotaware to test your ADSB output.  You will see your aircraft in the traffic page if all is well.

57
General Discussion / Re: FL*RM Integration - Beta Testers
« on: December 16, 2016, 08:19:21 am »
Peter,
    Thank you for the help. I will try the end fed dipole To see if I can improve reception. I can mount it in various locations. Keep us informed on your findings too. 

58
General Discussion / Re: FL*RM Integration - Beta Testers
« on: December 15, 2016, 08:24:12 pm »
Hi Lee,
    Yes it is..... and a better price too.
        I was just wanting to know if anyone had experience with it and would like to comment. It looks like a simple made dipole with heat shrink on each side of a plastic "T" probably cost more to post it than to make it.

59
General Discussion / Re: FL*RM Integration - Beta Testers
« on: December 15, 2016, 08:00:25 pm »
 On my quest to improve FLARM reception I came across an antenna suplyed by navboys called P01. See attachment. Has anyone any Expereance with this antenna? and is it as good as they say, as longer it is mounted in a good location.

60
General Discussion / Re: FL*RM Integration - Beta Testers
« on: December 13, 2016, 06:20:36 pm »
Peter,
    I feel as though I have the best I can achieve on the Europa. The antennas are mounted externally on the a ground-plane using the 1/4 wave eternal antenna supplied by the PAW team, There is a picture earlier in the thread

  http://forum.pilotaware.com/index.php/topic,553.120.html

I was just looking for improvements that may be possible for the poor output from the FLARM devices. Calling it poor output is probably incorrect as FLARM devices tend to fly close to each other. If the signal was stronger they would get false alerts on the glider displays from an other glider much grater distance away.

If we could get to just receive them from a grater distaste would be a big advantage.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 24