16
General Discussion / Re: aircrew,co,uk not responding
« on: December 14, 2022, 09:56:03 am »
Thanks Ian, i it was my Firewall, the problem is fixed now.
Show Posts
You can view here all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas to which you currently have access.
17
General Discussion / Re: aircrew,co,uk not responding
« on: December 12, 2022, 01:50:51 pm »
Having problems again with the playback feature of aircrew. i think my browser/firewall is blocking it as the certificate is not up to date - anybody else having the same problem? My browser allows the main site but the playback feature is blocked??
18
Technical Support / Re: Corrupted track files?
« on: December 03, 2022, 12:22:43 am »
i also have experienced corrupted trk files for a couple of months and i am using 20220805. The corruption being obvious if i upload to aircrew.
The corruption causes the trk files to be small. An hour flight has a trk file of 350kb say instead of 4mb.
I have deleted all my trk files on the micro SD card so that the maximum space is available, but this does not help. Maybe my micro SD disk is somehow corrupt.
PAW seems to be working ok warning me of traffic, it is just not making a proper trk file.
There is no error msg which seems odd to me as something is going wrong when records are being written to disk,
and hundreds of records per flight are going astray.
The corruption causes the trk files to be small. An hour flight has a trk file of 350kb say instead of 4mb.
I have deleted all my trk files on the micro SD card so that the maximum space is available, but this does not help. Maybe my micro SD disk is somehow corrupt.
PAW seems to be working ok warning me of traffic, it is just not making a proper trk file.
There is no error msg which seems odd to me as something is going wrong when records are being written to disk,
and hundreds of records per flight are going astray.
19
General Discussion / Re: Enhancement Requests
« on: September 28, 2022, 05:26:26 pm »
Uploaded the new August software using the IOS app. All worked fine and I see that the app does tell you what the latest software version is but one has to check with the app.
But where are the notes on the version ? There is no changelog provided to the user when the app is used and frankly messing around with zip files when there is an app available is not something I am going to do.
So I say again there should be a version history!
Who knows what new feature there are or bugs fixed if there is no version history.
But where are the notes on the version ? There is no changelog provided to the user when the app is used and frankly messing around with zip files when there is an app available is not something I am going to do.
So I say again there should be a version history!
Who knows what new feature there are or bugs fixed if there is no version history.
20
General Discussion / Re: Enhancement Requests
« on: September 27, 2022, 09:33:21 am »
Maybe a topic entitled Version History with a brief outline of the changes. What was the Aug update for, for instance ?
21
General Discussion / Re: Enhancement Requests
« on: September 26, 2022, 03:11:47 pm »
I updated my software using the 20220602 version which was well advertised but i see from the above that there was an August update. Could updates be advertised on the forum maybe in a special topic relating only to LATEST SOFTWARE REVISION ?
22
General Discussion / Re: Enhancement Requests
« on: September 22, 2022, 05:18:03 pm »
So much for voila
23
General Discussion / Re: Enhancement Requests
« on: September 12, 2022, 07:10:36 pm »VoilaCould you please be more specific and tell me where to start to get this result
24
General Discussion / Re: Enhancement Requests
« on: September 02, 2022, 03:07:18 pm »
Radar page Nautical Miles option ?
Now we have weather, and very useful it is, can we have the option for nautical miles instead of km so my brain does not have to keep calculating as I compare my onboard GPS nm to my next turning point ?
The weather picture on my route Gloster - Shoreham this morning was amazing
Now we have weather, and very useful it is, can we have the option for nautical miles instead of km so my brain does not have to keep calculating as I compare my onboard GPS nm to my next turning point ?
The weather picture on my route Gloster - Shoreham this morning was amazing
25
Technical Support / Re: 20220101
« on: January 05, 2022, 07:40:36 pm »
Just in case i messed up the update i did both flights today with the old software.
I need not have worried.
Arriving back at base as PilotAware was already linked to my Ipad based EFB and my Ipad has mobile data I selected the update App and clicked on the update icon and all of the next steps performed FLAWLESSLY
Well done everybody.
All the best for 2022
I need not have worried.
Arriving back at base as PilotAware was already linked to my Ipad based EFB and my Ipad has mobile data I selected the update App and clicked on the update icon and all of the next steps performed FLAWLESSLY
Well done everybody.
All the best for 2022
26
General Discussion / Re: Atom Station Uplinks
« on: August 10, 2021, 09:42:23 pm »
Thanks I have watched the vids.
My question regards the case where a nearby aircraft has both mode S and PAW and I have PAW and both of us are flying near ATOM ground stations. If my aircraft detects the other aircraft PAW - PAW then great but because of obscuration PAW-PAW may be ineffective at a further moment in time. Should my aircraft, already detecting the other aircraft from its mode-s transmission ie same ICAO code, then receive MLAT data at that point in time albeit with obvious latency degraded info?
My question regards the case where a nearby aircraft has both mode S and PAW and I have PAW and both of us are flying near ATOM ground stations. If my aircraft detects the other aircraft PAW - PAW then great but because of obscuration PAW-PAW may be ineffective at a further moment in time. Should my aircraft, already detecting the other aircraft from its mode-s transmission ie same ICAO code, then receive MLAT data at that point in time albeit with obvious latency degraded info?
27
General Discussion / Atom Station Uplinks
« on: August 04, 2021, 08:26:05 pm »
When an ATOM stn sees a PAW aircraft say aircraft "A" I take it the ATOM stn expects nearby PAW equipped aircraft will 'see' the aircraft "A" direct and consequently the ATOM stn does nothing. But other aircraft may not see "A" direct due to various circumstances. If aircraft "A" also has, say, mode-s it would be useful if the mode-s position of "A" was announced (if available) to all aircraft by the ATOM Stn. just in case.
28
General Discussion / Re: Pilotaware ATOM "This was the game changer on the day"
« on: June 07, 2021, 09:29:16 pm »
SteveU,
It may be better to PM you the reg, and I'll find the current position of the SE2 in the AA5. This will avoid me drifting this thread anymore from the original title, which was a very good account.
It may be better to PM you the reg, and I'll find the current position of the SE2 in the AA5. This will avoid me drifting this thread anymore from the original title, which was a very good account.
29
General Discussion / Re: Pilotaware ATOM "This was the game changer on the day"
« on: June 07, 2021, 11:55:46 am »
Great news.
Can you send me contact info for future reference please?
Can you send me contact info for future reference please?
30
General Discussion / Re: Pilotaware ATOM "This was the game changer on the day"
« on: June 06, 2021, 11:52:58 pm »
Lee, Peter, and SteveU thanks for your feedback and comments.
Peter and SteveU
Lets hope you are right about the SE2 guys optimising the placement of their kit. I may be being too hard on them generally. On an individual level I have tried to help an AA5 flyer friend with an SE2 but his Vector diagram is still pathetic. If anybody has an AA5 and can show the best position I will pass the info on to my AA5 friend. I did not argue his choice of EC as he only has a mode C transponder.
SteveU,
I have the Rosetta in the rear window P1 side of my Archer and am very impressed with all the Uplink MLAT data from Selsey etc. I even get reports on MLAT circuit traffic at Shoreham albeit intermittently. I see a fair amount of 'P' contacts, and ADS-B contacts though probably from transponders. If we could get Aircrew to differentiate between SE2 and transponder ADS-B I would be wiser without the difficulty of trawling through the data by hand
So the spam can is not too much of a problem interference wise.
Well done with the ground station.
Phil
Peter and SteveU
Lets hope you are right about the SE2 guys optimising the placement of their kit. I may be being too hard on them generally. On an individual level I have tried to help an AA5 flyer friend with an SE2 but his Vector diagram is still pathetic. If anybody has an AA5 and can show the best position I will pass the info on to my AA5 friend. I did not argue his choice of EC as he only has a mode C transponder.
SteveU,
I have the Rosetta in the rear window P1 side of my Archer and am very impressed with all the Uplink MLAT data from Selsey etc. I even get reports on MLAT circuit traffic at Shoreham albeit intermittently. I see a fair amount of 'P' contacts, and ADS-B contacts though probably from transponders. If we could get Aircrew to differentiate between SE2 and transponder ADS-B I would be wiser without the difficulty of trawling through the data by hand
So the spam can is not too much of a problem interference wise.
Well done with the ground station.
Phil