Show Posts
1
General Discussion / CAA endorsement of PAW?
« on: July 05, 2018, 03:36:34 pm »
Interesting airprox article anyway, and in addition because of this endorsement:
"Members noted that neither aircraft was fitted with any form of electronic conspicuity equipment which would likely have alerted them to the presence of each other; given the increasingly affordable systems such as PilotAware that were now available, they urged all pilots to review whether now was the time to consider investing in such relatively low-cost safety systems."
Well done PAW! Awesome job.
I think now is also a good time to make some of the PAW features/UI more aviation and less engineering, such as putting audio warnings in nm not km!
"Members noted that neither aircraft was fitted with any form of electronic conspicuity equipment which would likely have alerted them to the presence of each other; given the increasingly affordable systems such as PilotAware that were now available, they urged all pilots to review whether now was the time to consider investing in such relatively low-cost safety systems."
Well done PAW! Awesome job.
I think now is also a good time to make some of the PAW features/UI more aviation and less engineering, such as putting audio warnings in nm not km!